Doctor Who Intentionally Severs Bonds With Mothers Is a Monster
This Dr. Harry Harlow was not just unsympathetic, but a monster just like the unethical doctors who forcefully remove children from loving mothers by claiming parental alienation to give them to their abusers. Why do they do this? Because they get paid by the abuser to do this! It’s a fraud on the courts that needs to end!
From the Top Ten Unethical Psychological Experiments
The Well of Despair 1960Dr. Harry Harlow was an unsympathetic person, using terms like the rape rack and iron maiden in his experiments. He is most well-known for the experiments he conducted on rhesus monkeys concerning social isolation. Dr. Harlow took infant rhesus monkeys who had already bonded with their mothers and placed them in a stainless steel vertical chamber device alone with no contact in order to sever those bonds. They were kept in the chambers for up to one year. Many of these monkeys came out of the chamber psychotic, and many did not recover. Dr. Harlow concluded that even a happy, normal childhood was no defense against depression, while science writer Deborah Blum called these, common sense results.
Gene Sackett of the University of Washington in Seattle, one of Harlows doctoral students, stated he believes the animal liberation movement in the U.S. was born as a result of Harlows experiments. William Mason, one of Harlows students, said that Harlow kept this going to the point where it was clear to many people that the work was really violating ordinary sensibilities, that anybody with respect for life or people would find this offensive. Its as if he sat down and said, Im only going to be around another ten years. What Id like to do, then, is leave a great big mess behind. If that was his aim, he did a perfect job.
Any doctor removing a child from their mother using the fraudulent theory of parental alienation or other phony psychobabble BS needs to be exposed for the monsters they are. They come up with phony rhetoric and say it in a convincing manner, much like they did back in Salem when they accused women of witchcraft.
This Parental Alienation Custody Change Fraud is going to go down in history as one of the most unethical psychological social engineering experiments of all time. The scandal is on the same level as the cover up of sexual abuse by the Catholic Church. It’s time people start to wake up and recognize that these doctors are covering up for all types of domestic abuse against women and children for PROFIT.
If you click on the links regarding Dr. Harry Harlow, you will find out that he received awards from psychological associations. Maybe this will start to get people thinking that there are groups of people doing unethical experiments and they do support each other on their theories and cover up for each other. The APA also published the Rind Study which tried to justify child sexual abuse as being acceptable and not that harmful to children. There is a common thread between all of these sick studies that push quack theories to justify unacceptable behavior. Only with Parental Alienation Theory, the whole idea is to call the victims liars which re-victimizes them. All that is needed to do this is to pay an unethical doctor to testify who will ignore real evidence and substitute in their fraudulent rhetoric.
When people realized the horrible treatment of animals that Harlow inflicted, the result was an animal liberation movement. What needs to happen as a result of these unethical parental alienation scams is for children to have a liberation movement and demand to have rights to be heard and to make their own decisions.
And Intentionally Scaring Monkeys
Posted in Abraham Worenklein, Alabama, Alaska, Amy J. L. Baker, Anthony Pisa, Arizona, Arla Witte, Australia, Barbara Fidler,Barry Bricklin, Bernard Joseph Goldberg, Bob Hoch, C. David Missar, California, Canada, Christopher Tilman, Cole Eason,Colorado, Connecticut, Dalia Saffa Biller, David L. Levy, David Sweet, David Tassoni, Deborah Day, Diane Rotnem, Doneldon Dennis, Donna Wowk, Elizabeth McCarty, Florida, Frank Marocco, Fred Norris, Gail Brick, Gary Karpin, Georgia, Glenn Caddy,Gregory Sisk, Harold Niman, Harry Harlow, Illinois, Indiana, J. Michael Bone, Jack Ferrell, Jake Cooley, Jan Faust, Jayne Major,Jeffry Price, Jim Campbell, John Zervopoulos, Joseph Goldberg, Judge Bob Wattles, Judge Charles A. Porter, Judge Damian Amodeo, Judge Daniel C. Banina, Judge David Barker, Judge Henry Walsh, Judge Howard Lipsey, Judge Jennifer Elliott, Judge Jeremiah Jeremiah, Judge John Gomery, Judge Joseph A. Dugen, Judge Karen G. Shields, Judge Lawrence J. Stengel, Judge Mark A. Ciavarella, Judge Michael T. Conahan, Judge Neil Buckley, Judge Peter J. McBrien, Judge Susan Greenhawt, Judge W. Stephen Nixon, Judges, Justice Faye McWatt, Kansas, Karen Allen, Kay Kraus, Lawyers, GALs, Mediators, Et Al, Leslie Riggs,Lisette Laurent Boyer, Locations, Lorah Sebastian, Mark Hirschfeld, Mark Hoffman, Martha Jacobson, Marty McKay, Mary Laughead, Maryland, Maureen Patton, Meg Sussman, Mental Health Professionals, Michael Baer, Michael Perzin, Minnesota,Missouri, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Pamela Stuart-Mills Hoch, Patricia Scaglia, Pennsylvania, Phil Heller, Ralph Underwager,Raymond David, Reena Sommer, Rhode Island, Richard Gardner, Richard Sauber, Richard Warshak, Robert Basham, S. Richard Sauber, Sherrie Bourg Carter, Stephanie Holland, Stuart Greenberg, Susan DeVries, Texas, UK, Vicki Plant, Virginia,Washington, William Wrigley. Tags: abuse, child abuse, custody, divorce, domestic abuse, Family Court, fraud, parental alienation, psychologist, unethical, visitation. 14 Comments »
Technorati Tags: Doctor,Monster,From,Harry,doctors,children,alienation,abuser,fraud,courts,needs,Unethical,Psychological,Despair,person,rack,isolation,infant,chamber,Many,defense,depression,science,writer,Deborah,Blum,results,Gene,Sackett,Washington,Seattle,Harlows,liberation,movement,result,William,Mason,life,theory,rhetoric,manner,Salem,Parental,Custody,Change,history,scandal,Catholic,Church,PROFIT,links,associations,Maybe,Rind,Study,quack,behavior,victims,treatment,animals,rights,Abraham,Worenklein,Alabama,Alaska,Baker,Anthony,Pisa,Arizona,Arla,Witte,Australia,Barbara,Fidler,Barry,Bricklin,Bernard,Joseph,Goldberg,Hoch,David,Missar,California,Canada,Christopher,Tilman,Cole,Eason,Colorado,Connecticut,Dalia,Saffa,Biller,Levy,Sweet,Tassoni,Diane,Rotnem,Doneldon,Dennis,Donna,Wowk,Elizabeth,Florida,Frank,Marocco,Norris,Gail,Brick,Gary,Karpin,Georgia,Glenn,Caddy,Gregory,Sisk,Harold,Niman,Illinois,Indiana,Michael,Jack,Ferrell,Jake,Cooley,Faust,Jayne,Major,Jeffry,Price,Campbell,John,Zervopoulos,Judge,Wattles,Charles,Porter,Damian,Amodeo,Daniel,Banina,Barker,Henry,Walsh,Howard,Lipsey,Jennifer,Elliott,Jeremiah,Gomery,Dugen,Karen,Lawrence,Stengel,Mark,Ciavarella,Conahan,Neil,Buckley,Peter,McBrien,Susan,Greenhawt,Stephen,Nixon,Judges,Justice,Faye,McWatt,Kansas,Allen,Kraus,GALs,Mediators,Leslie,Riggs,Lisette,Laurent,Boyer,Lorah,Sebastian,Hirschfeld,Hoffman,Martha,Jacobson,McKay,Mary,Laughead,Maryland,Patton,Sussman,Mental,Health,Baer,Perzin,Minnesota,Missouri,Nevada,York,Oregon,Pamela,Stuart,Patricia,Scaglia,Pennsylvania,Phil,Heller,Ralph,Underwager,Raymond,Reena,Sommer,Rhode,Island,Richard,Gardner,Sauber,Warshak,Robert,Basham,Sherrie,Bourg,Carter,Stephanie,Holland,Greenberg,DeVries,Texas,Vicki,Plant,Virginia,Wrigley,Court,Comments,monkeys,chambers,students,theories,scams,decisions,Lawyers,Locations,rhesus,women,sexual
Kansas Governor : New Domestic Violence Law; April 20, 2010 at 10:30 a.m.
http://www.kslegislature.org/bills/2010/2517.pdf
Kansas Governor to sign DV bill
On April 20 at 10:30 a.m. at Topeka Capitol Plaza Hotel, Kansas Governor Mark Parkinson will sign the domestic violence designation bill that was earlier passed by the
Kansas Legislature.
Kansas Legislature passes DV bill
It is official. The Kansas Legislature has passed the DV Designation Bill HB2517. On March 30, the Kansas House passed the Senate version 119-0. This is the most comprehensive domestic violence legislation ever passed in Kansas. All that remains is the Governor’s signature to turn this bill into law. The Brungardts are overwhelmed by this news and thank you all for your support. News
KANSAS HOUSE BILL 2517 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TAG
- Kansas House Bill 2517: Domestic Violence Law Tag …
- Say NO – UNiTE Globally to End Violence Against Wo…
- Today they vote on Kansas HB 2517 Domestic Violenc…
- KS Legislators consider new domestic violence bill…
- FOX4: Advocates, Prosecutors Pushing for Tougher K…
- Audio Testimony Before the House Committee on Corr…
- KS HB 2517 – Completed Submitted written Testimoni…
- Kansas Lawmakers Heard Testimony Today on Domestic…
- Kansas Committee to hear testimony on Domestic Vio…
http://www.kslegislature.org/bills/2010/2517.pdf
KS Governor to sign into law April 20, 2010 Kansas House Bill 2517: Domestic Violence Law
Substitute for HOUSE BILL No. 2517
AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to domestic violence; amending K.S.A. 20-369, 22-2307 and 22-2908 and K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 21-3110,
21-3412a, 21-4603d, 22-2909 and 75-712 and repealing the existing sections.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas:
New Section 1. (a) On and after July 1, 2011, in all criminal cases, if there is evidence that the defendant committed a domestic violence offense, the trier of fact shall determine whether the defendant committed a domestic violence offense.
Technorati Tags: Kansas,Governor,Domestic,Violence,Bill,April,JanasCampaign,Topeka,Capitol,Plaza,Hotel,Mark,Parkinson,designation,Legislature,March,House,Senate,version,signature,Brungardts,news,UNiTE,Against,Violenc,Legislators,Prosecutors,Tougher,Audio,Testimony,Committee,Corr,Testimoni,mode,Substitute,punishment,procedure,Supp,State,Section,cases,fact,Except,subject,subsection,diversion,complaint,revenge,person,offender,relationship,member,code,crime,basis,courts,system,administration,justice,attorney,rules,regulations,district,fees,Expenditures,response,words,context,failure,omission,action,Another,persons,Conduct,series,Conviction,judgment,guilt,plea,Deception,representation,Take,owner,possession,Retain,compensation,Sell,ordinance,violation,definition,nature,addition,determination,length,frequency,interaction,termination,woman,father,portion,tent,human,habitation,residence,Firearm,weapon,projectile,explosion,combustion,Forcible,felony,treason,manslaughter,robbery,burglary,threat,Intent,intention,reliance,obligation,reference,officer,virtue,office,department,employee,campus,Obtain,sale,conveyance,corporation,government,partnership,Personal,goods,chattels,rights,Prosecution,proceedings,Public,subdivision,purpose,controversy,agreement,Real,estate,lands,Solicit,jurisdiction,territory,Columbia,Commonwealth,Puerto,Rico,Stolen,theft,Written,instrument,paper,money,badge,trademark,symbol,advantage,disadvantage,battery,manner,Upon,misdemeanor,discretion,prevention,imprisonment,confinement,probation,suspension,reduction,treatment,account,period,Commit,custody,secretary,departure,history,category,placement,services,orders,restitution,conservation,supervision,drug,education,chapter,apprehension,expenses,agency,investigation,repayment,combination,imposition,documents,debt,execution,noncompliance,payment,victim,accordance,agent,collection,evaluation,defense,reimbursement,method,satisfaction,hardship,assignment,role,requirements,event,prison,article,Prior,grid,guideline,incarceration,guidelines,Labette,amendment,Pursuant,paragraph,voucher,statute,forfeiture,result,acceptance,inmate,admission,completion,refusal,disposition,substance,stance,vehicle,highway,street,places,duration,receipt,administrator,expiration,vision,assessment,statement,actions,Arrest,victims,responsibilities,procedures,protection,Indian,tribe,emergency,numbers,benefits,bureau,interests,characteristics,certification,needs,impact,accident,collision,injury,death,constitution,arraignment,jury,maintenance,participation,guidance,stipulation,provision,requirement,cereal,beverage,privileges,records,director,donations,transactions,connection,background,confirmation,direction,appointments,data,reports,intelligence,qualifications,publication,Speaker,Chief,Clerk,President,Lawmakers,crimes,amendments,recommendations,moneys,definitions,purposes,factors,spouses,corrections,instruments,tenements,convictions,violations,stoppers,substances,judgments,installments,obligations,Statutes,criteria,offenders,streets,highways,vehicles,agencies,policies,officers,complaints,incidents,diversions,examinations,visions,agreements,investigations,institutions,members,kslegislature,lence,defendant,trier,shall,whether,thereto,whom,whereby,hereby,suant,fender,par
ents,stepparents,chil,dren,stepchildren,thereof,hicle,trict,hours,months,five,impris,parole,gram,third,tion,lieu,dispositional,viction,presumptive,nonprison,tence,revocation,correctional,ments,therefor,alcohol,postrelease,nondrug,indigents,analog,driver,licensee,erate,prosecutor,waiver,appointee
(KS) Women Receive Overwhelming Response For Child Abuse Yard Signs
http://www.kake.com/news/headlines/91150889.html?ref=889
Women Receive Overwhelming Response For Child Abuse Yard Signs
Two local women are taking action following the recent abuse deaths of two children.
Reporter: Jared Cerullo
Email Address: jared.cerullo@kake.com
Friday, April 16, 2010
Two local women are taking action following the recent abuse deaths of two children. The women are giving away yard signs asking people to call 911 if they suspect a child is being abused and they’re getting an overwhelming response.
"That’s our Vincent’s prayer," said Lily Hill as she looked at the bright yellow sign that says ‘Be aware. Child abuse can be anywhere. Call 911.’
That’s the message Hill and Beverly Van Es want posted on every city block. Their actions were prompted by the brutal abuse deaths of Karsyn Young and Vincent Hill.
"Maybe even abusers will think ‘Oh dear, somebody might be watching me and somebody might be listening and I could get in trouble. Maybe I won’t do that."’
These grandmother’s are getting an overwhelming response from people wanting a sign to put in their own yard. Even as we were interviewing them, someone knocked on the door to pick one up. Hill and Van Es have spent $600 of their own money for the first batch of signs and all of them are spoken for.
"One person can make a difference. One person has many friends. Two grandmas can really make a difference," said Van Es.
"We want people thinking about this," Hill explained. "We want people to think about the horrors that are going on. World War II prisoners of war weren’t treated and tortured the way baby Vincent was."
These grandmas have loaded up a suburban with hundreds of signs to give away this weekend. They’ll be giving them out at Asbury Church at 15th and St. Paul from 10-noon on Saturday. They’ve already given away 100 of them and have 200 more more on order. One by one they say, with help from above, they will cover the city with Vincent’s prayer.
"We’re just a couple grandmas that care," said Van Es. "And we got signs."
If you would like a sign for your yard you can contact Beverly Van Es at 316-838-8601 or Lily Hill at 316-946-1437. They say they will buy as many signs as they can, but would appreciate any donations to help offset the costs.
http://www.kake.com/news/headlines/89653847.html
March 31, 2010
Abuse Hotline Call Dismissed Months Before Baby’s Death
The Harvey County Sheriff’s Department says an abuse hotline call regarding 19-month-old Vincent Hill was dismissed two months prior to his death.
Reporter: Stephanie Diffin
Email Address: stephanie.diffin@kake.com
The Harvey County Sheriff’s Department confirms someone called an SRS abuse hotline more than two months before 19-month-old Vincent Hill was allegedly beaten to death. But Newton SRS and Harvey County law enforcement say they were never informed of the call.
The call came in from a couple who lived in the same duplex as Hill, his mother, Katheryn Nycole Dale, and her boyfriend, Chadd Carr. Dale and Carr are both charged in the case.
"Nothing ever gets done until it’s too late, and unfortunately, it’s too late," said Jason Monarez, the victim’s neighbor.
Vincent Hill’s father describes the little boy as happy and always smiling.
"He’s never going to be able to play catch with me, I’m never going to teach him how to learn how to fish," said Ricky Hill, Vincent’s father. "I”m not going to get to see him do anything."
Now, Ricky Hill wonders if he would have gotten the chance to see those things if social services had further investigated a call it received on January 20th, two months before Vincent’s death.
"We tried to stop it, we tried… me and my girlfriend both," said Monarez. "You could just hear through the wall, the child screaming."
So Monarez’ girlfriend called an SRS abuse hotline. But the center dismissed the call saying it didn’t indicate there was any harm taking place to the child. The last sentence of the report reads, "This completes the initial assessment with no further action needed."
"It just makes me angry, really, to know that i tried and it wasn’t taken seriously," said Jessica Link, who placed the call.
Since the call stopped at the call center, Newton SRS says it never got word of the suspected abuse.
"If they would have had the report, they probably would have notified us, and something would have gotten done," said Harvey County Sheriff T. Walton.
SRS will not comment about specific cases, but did release this statement on the process of investigating calls to its hotline;
"SRS receives reports of alleged abuse and neglect through our Kansas Protection Report Center, 1-800-922-5330. In State fiscal year 2009 SRS received 56,207 reports of alleged abuse or neglect. Of those, 49% or 27,340, cases were assigned for further investigation."
"Intake workers receive protective services training to elicit specific information about the situation. Information requested is focused on the extent of the situation, circumstances of the situation, child’s functioning, parenting practices and caregiver function, in addition to information regarding the child’s age, person alleged to have caused harm to the child, where the child is located, other individuals or agencies who may have information regarding the incident and the availability of a non-abusing adult to protect the child from further harm."
"The information gathered through the intake process is then provided to a licensed social worker to review and determine whether the incident requires further investigation. This decision is based on specific safety and risk factors, including but not limited to: seriousness of the incident, prior agency involvement with the family, and seriousness of injury to child."
"All reports assigned for further investigation involving allegations of maltreatment of child must be investigated within either a 24 hour or 72 hour timeframe, depending on the nature of the allegation. Situations requiring a 24 hour response include, but are not limited to: life threatening situation, sexual abuse with the alleged perpetrator in the home, child in protective custody, or a child with current visible injuries."
"Certain reports, not alleging maltreatment, may be investigated within 20 working days. An example of this type of case would be truancy."
http://www.thekansan.com/highlights/x1838117985/Charges-filed-in-toddler-s-death
Charges filed in toddler’s death
By Cristina Janney
Posted Mar 31, 2010 @ 12:07 PM
NORTH NEWTON —
Chad Carr
Charges were filed in Harvey County District Court Tuesday in the suspicious death of a 19-month-old boy Saturday in North Newton.
Chad Carr, 26, 115 W. 24th St. in North Newton, is charged with two counts of aggravated battery and two counts of abuse of a child in the death of Vincent James Hill.
Carr allegedly was the boyfriend of the child’s mother, Katheryn Nycole Dale, who was not home at the time of the child’s death.
Carr allegedly was home alone with the child when he called 911 to report the child was not breathing. Carr allegedly tried to revive the child, but the child was taken to Newton Medical Center by Newton Fire/EMS where he was pronounced dead.
Law enforcement officials said Monday the child was bruised from head to toe and showed signs of previous injuries.
Further investigation found a concern had been called into the Social and Rehabilitation Services abuse center on Jan. 20.
The report did indicate a neighbor had heard yelling and screaming between the child and an adult male, a news release from the Harvey County Sheriff’s department stated.
The report was screened out by SRS because SRS said the report did not indicate the child was being physically harmed, the news release stated.
The report was never forwarded to any law enforcement agency for follow up.
Carr was booked on suspicion of murder, but County Attorney David Yoder said he is waiting for an autopsy report before deciding whether to file more serious charges.
On a search of Carr’s residence, police found marijuana and drug paraphernalia. Carr has not been charged on the drug offenses.
Yoder said he wants to further review the evidence gathered by police to determine if he will file any charges on those offenses.
Carr is being held in the Harvey County Detention Center on a $150,000 bond.
A funeral service for the child will be at 1 p.m. Saturday at Peabody United Methodist Church.
Copyright 2010 The Newton Kansan. Some rights reserved
http://www.kansas.com/2010/03/30/1247216/neighbor-had-called-hotline-about.html
Posted on Tue, Mar. 30, 2010
Neighbor had called hotline about Newton child who died
Comments (0)
BY TIM POTTER
The Wichita Eagle
NORTH NEWTON — A 19-month-old boy had a broken collarbone, a broken lower leg and bruises from head to toe.
But no one directly told local authorities that something was wrong in the child’s life until after he died, local law enforcement officials said Monday.
They announced that a man who had been living at the 19-month-old’
Technorati Tags: Women,Receive,Response,Child,Abuse,Yard,Signs,news,action,children,Reporter,Cerullo,Email,April,Vincent,prayer,Hill,Call,message,actions,Karsyn,Young,Maybe,somebody,door,money,batch,person,difference,friends,World,Asbury,Church,Paul,noon,donations,March,Hotline,Months,Baby,Death,Harvey,Sheriff,Department,Stephanie,Diffin,Newton,Katheryn,Nycole,Dale,Chadd,Carr,Jason,Monarez,victim,neighbor,father,Ricky,services,January,assessment,Jessica,Link,word,Walton,cases,statement,reports,Kansas,Protection,Report,Center,State,investigation,Intake,workers,situation,Information,extent,addition,individuals,incident,worker,decision,agency,involvement,injury,maltreatment,nature,allegation,life,perpetrator,custody,Certain,example,truancy,highlights,toddler,Cristina,Janney,Kansan,NORTH,Chad,District,Court,battery,James,Medical,Fire,Further,Social,Rehabilitation,male,suspicion,Attorney,David,Yoder,residence,drug,paraphernalia,Detention,funeral,Peabody,Methodist,Some,rights,Comments,POTTER,Wichita,Eagle,authorities,deaths,horrors,prisoners,agencies,factors,allegations,Situations,injuries,kake,html,grandmas,month,boyfriend,gotten,girlfriend,whether,hour
(KS) Father keeps Child’s Coffin in Living Room where child lives
Courts Have Continued Abuse Of Manhattan Woman
By Jon A. Brake
Manhattan Free Press
MANHATTAN, KS – To some this could be considered beautiful. Solid mahogany is beautiful when given a high finish and it does have a high finish. It is about four to four and a half feet long, a foot and a half high; with shinny brass handles at the foot and head. A child’s coffin, in this home has been turned into a coffee table.
To Claudine Dombrowski it is not beautiful, that is her daughter, six-year-old Rikki on the couch behind the threatening coffee table. If a coffin coffee table is not enough, a hunting rifle hangs on the wall above the couch.
Claudine, a Manhattan resident, was divorced from Hal Richardson in Shawnee County District Count in 1997. She had been a repeat victim of Domestic Violence and a repeat victim of the State Court System.
What does the Court System think of the coffin coffee table? In a letter to Shawnee County District Court Division Two Judge Richard D. Anderson, Harry Moore, with the Court Services stated: "When I was at the house, I did not recognize anything which in my experience resembled a child’s coffin. After looking at the picture and speaking with Mr. Richardson, I have come to find out that it is indeed a coffin and that it was an antique which he purchased in Mexico several years ago and uses as a coffee or end table of sorts."
What about the rifle? Mr. Moore said, "There is also a secured hunting weapon hanging on Mr. Richardson’s wall. The thing which is striking about this specific issue is that it contains a remarkable leap of logic. For instance, I am the owner of a 7.9 mm Mauser rifle which was the standard issue firearm for the German soldier in World War II. This weapon was procured by my father who served in Europe during the war. This weapon also hangs on the wall in my rec room. Does my ownership and display of this firearm lead one to the conclusion that I am a Nazi?"
The question Mr. Moore failed to answer is: "Is it a leap of logic for an abused woman to see the child’s coffin and the rifle as more than furniture? Is there a message to the mother? The Shawnee District Court has missed many messages when it comes to the violence in this case.
When reading Court documents it is clear that attorneys have intentionally muddied the waters. It was a nasty divorce, those things happen. Eight or more attorneys, three different Judges and several Court Service workers have filed motion after motion. In the end a Judge wants to compel a dysfunctional family to be normal. It can’t be done.
Halleck (Hal) Richardson and Claudine Dombrowske lived together for several months before they were married on November 22, 1995. Divorce papers were filed four month later. By this time records show Hal Richardson had abused Claudine and he had Domestic Battery and Criminal Damage to property convictions.
Hal had seven other convictions before 1995. The convictions were for Battery, Attempted Battery, Battery of a Law Enforcement Officer, Obstruction of Legal Process, Possession of Marijuana and an Open Container conviction.
Most of the Probation Conditions were never followed up on by court officials. After the Domestic Battery conviction, Hal was ordered to attend an "Alternatives to Battering Program" put on by the Battered Women Task Force in Topeka. A few of the comments made on Hal’s report were: "Client rude and disrespectful to female co-facilitator as evidenced by his combative stance, his repeated interruptions, his sexist language and his refusal to accept any responsibility."
Another report stated: "Client very disruptive during group, this was evidenced by the fact that he interrupted the facilitator repeatedly by making rude comments, laughing and telling inappropriate sexist jokes."
And finally: "Called PO (probation officer) and client to tell them that he had graduated as far as I was concerned. He only has 17 sessions, but is causing too much trouble with his mouth. Terminated, with cause. Will not be accepted back."
The divorce proceedings were extended for eighteen months. Throughout the proceedings Claudine’s attorneys filed numerous reports claiming violations of the restraining order and requesting an order to sever contact between Hal, Claudine and daughter Rikki.
The first involved an incident that both parties agreed in court happened, they just could not agree what happened. Claudine said she was hit in the head with a crow bar and Hal said it was a piece of wood. What ever he hit her with it took 24 stitches to close the head wounds.
At a hearing on June 17, 1996 Shawnee County District Court Judge Jan W. Leuenberger signed order giving custody of Rikki to Claudine and authorizing her to move to the Great Bend area so that "Ms. Dombrowski could avoid the history of physical and verbal abuse she had suffered from Mr. Richardson."
Hal was given supervised visitation.
As in many divorce cases the Judge on November 5, 1996 appointed Mr. Scott McKenzie, Attorney at Law, to serve as Guardian ad Litem to appear on behalf of Rikki. Mr. McKenzie was very experienced in juvenile court proceedings with more than 1,000 cases but this was only his sixth Guardian ad Litem. Under Mr. McKenzie direction visitation terms were worked out to where Claudine would keep Rikki for three weeks and then Hal would have her for a week.
Before the Divorce Trial started a new Judge took over. Judge James P. Buchele replaced Judge Leuenberger.
It is about this time the Court and Court appointed case workers attitued changed. Judge Buchele saw that fifty people were being called as witnesses for the trial. He placed a limit of five for each side. This can be done but it can cause problems. Court documents state: "These limits made it difficult or impossible for Ms. Dombrowski to bring in all of the witnesses to corroborate here clams." During the trial the Judge would not allow hearsay evidence but the proper witness was not there to testify.
At trial Mr. McKenzie indicated, "after reading the police reports of the violence, and the doctor’s reports, he was not able to validate any of the truth of any of the accusations of violence made by Ms. Dombrowski."
When asked about Mr. Richardson’s criminal history Mr. McKenzie recalled only a single offense for driving under the influence of alcohol, and was unaware of the misdemeanor convictions including the domestic violence battery against Claudine. He was unaware of a misdemeanor battery for a bar fight and the battery of a law enforcement officer.
Records of the Battered Women’s Task Force had never been reviewed by Mr. McKenzie. Even thou Claudine had received support from the facility. In a report to the court Mr. McKenzie had recommended anger management therapy for Claudine but not for Hal.
In Judge Buchele’s Orders after the trial he made it clear that he wanted more from this couple than what was possible. Here is what he wrote: "Mutual parental involvement with this child has been made worse by Ms. Dombrowski’s unilateral decision to move to Larned, Kansas in May of 1996. The distance between Topeka and Larned makes it virtually impossible for an individual treater to work with the family; for Mr. Richardson to have regular and frequent contact with this child; to establish any reasonable dialogue between the parents toward resolving their conflicts. The move from Topeka to Larned, due to the proximity of the parties, has lessened the physical
violence. It has, however, done violence to the relationship of Rikki and her father. If long distance visitation is continued, in the Court’s view, will take its toll not only on Rikki but each of the parties. The Court specifically finds that separation of the child from either parent for long periods of time is harmful for a child of about three years of age."
He then went on to require Claudine to move back to the Topeka area.
And then Judge Buchele made a judgment that some Manhattan attorneys say is not legal. Judge Buchele ordered: "Further, respondent (Claudine) is directed to not call law enforcement authorities to investigate the petitioner (Hal) without first consulting with the case manager."
On December 14, 2000 after returning her daughter to her fathers home Claudine alleges that she was battered and raped by Hal. Under order not to call law enforcement authorities and with bleeding that would not stop, she drove to St. Marys, Kansas to get treatment. Claudine knew that if she had gone to a Topeka Hospital they would have called the police.
In St. Marys hospital officials did contact the Pottawatomie Sheriff and a report was made. She was advised that because the alleged event occurred in Shawnee County she would have to file there. Claudine said that because of the battery and rape she picked up Rikki the next day and did not return her. The Shawnee County Sheriff’s Department was called and took Rikki back to Topeka. The court gave Hal custody and orders for her to attend Topeka schools.
As it stands now, Rikki is with her father in Topeka. Claudine gets two one-hour visits per week. The child will go to school in Topeka unless a new motion, which will be filed this week, is granted. The motion will request that Claudine be given custody and Rikki be allowed to attend school in Manhattan.
This case has received national attention by the National Organization for Women; the Judicial Initiative Commission Hearing by the Citizens for Good Judges and it was told to the Kansas Justice Commission in 1997.
A new Judge will be hearing the motion. Judge Richard D. Anderson took over the case on the retirement of Judge Buchele. But, unless Claudine receives help from Kansas citizens, the abuse will continue. In July of 2000 Judge Anderson reaffirmed all of Judge Buchele’s previous orders. Evan the order to not call law enforcement authorities
Webmaster Note: You can contact Judge Richard D. Anderson at (785) 233-8200 ext. 4350
Technorati Tags: Father,Child,Coffin,Room,Courts,Abuse,Manhattan,Woman,Brake,Free,Solid,foot,brass,Claudine,Dombrowski,daughter,Rikki,Richardson,Shawnee,District,Count,victim,Domestic,Violence,State,Court,System,letter,Division,Judge,Richard,Anderson,Harry,Services,Mexico,weapon,logic,instance,owner,Mauser,firearm,German,soldier,World,Europe,ownership,conclusion,Nazi,furniture,message,messages,documents,Judges,Service,workers,Halleck,Dombrowske,November,Divorce,papers,records,Battery,Criminal,Damage,Enforcement,Officer,Obstruction,Legal,Possession,Marijuana,Open,Container,conviction,Most,Probation,Conditions,Program,Women,Task,Force,Topeka,comments,Client,facilitator,stance,sexist,language,refusal,Another,fact,proceedings,Throughout,reports,incident,piece,wood,June,Leuenberger,custody,Great,Bend,area,history,cases,Scott,McKenzie,Attorney,Guardian,Litem,Under,direction,Trial,James,Buchele,problems,hearsay,doctor,truth,misdemeanor,management,therapy,Orders,Here,Mutual,involvement,decision,Kansas,dialogue,relationship,separation,parent,judgment,Further,authorities,petitioner,manager,December,Marys,treatment,Hospital,Pottawatomie,Sheriff,event,Department,attention,National,Organization,Judicial,Initiative,Commission,Citizens,Justice,retirement,Evan,Webmaster,Note,feet,convictions,interruptions,sessions,violations,accusations,periods,fathers,four,attorneys,three,months,visitation,week
This is your brain on PAS/PA/PAD
PAS is a Scam Parental Alienation Syndrome
From: Glenn’s Cult
Remember those scare tactic videos about your brain on drugs? Don’t know about you but they worked for me. Now lets take this on a new spin. What is someone who believes PA/PAS/PAD doing to their brains? Why are women the only ones ever accused of alienation or gatekeeping? We have a case here which to my eye appears to have the ever present gatekeeping and alienation tactics happening.
So quick run down on this story. Mom "allegedly" kidnaps child and returns to her native country amid accusations by her of violence in the marriage. Mother remarries after divorce has another child and dies in childbirth. Father to older child goes on rampage in order to secure custody of older child – even amid allegations of violence by mother’s family in foreign country and mother’s widowed current spouse. Father eventually uses American politicians and television news stations in order to carry child out of mother’s native country. Now grandparents want to see child, want child to have a relationship with half sibling and father refuses.
What do you mean – father refuses? I thought all family should be allowed a relationship with children? Even with mother deceased shouldn’t siblings and extended family of mother’s be allowed continuing contact with child?
Apparently not and apparently the well known father’s rights blogger, Glenn Sacks, REFUSES to run any stories on this "gatekeeping" of the child by FATHER. Even Ken Walker (kc9bdr@yahoo.com) agrees that Father should be allowed to keep child from maternal family – in fact he even quotes: "The maternal grandparents take the grandson to Brazil for 5 years, (mother dies) then complain when they don’t get placement. Give it time!". Mother does this and it is automatically a given that mother is gatekeeping and engaging in PA/PAS/PAD. So why is this not true for FATHER? Is FATHER not gatekeeping and possibly engaging in PA/PAS/PAD? The child in question has been around the maternal relatives for years now. Are we punishing another innocent young child by denying that child the RIGHT to have a relationship with the older sibling?
Well, let me explain this so you get it really good, okay? Just as in this commercial about heroin use, PA/PAS/PAD has some rules too.
Women are the only ones who can gatekeep a child. Ladies, ladies. Here’s how it works. It’s only PAS/PA when we accuse you of doing it. When WE do the exact thing we just accused you of doing ("gatekeeping," obstructing visitation, etc.) it doesn’t count. WE are the ONLY ones who can protect our children. These children are not your children, they are only our children. Just like that nice new car we fought for in the divorce, just like the house. Oh and forget about any equitable split, that is all ours too. Any questions?
So go back and watch the video again.
Frying pan is PAS/PA/PAD.
Egg is your brain.
And the violence you see portrayed is what COULD happen if PA/PAS/PAD is bought hook, line, and sinker. Our children, our future will be destroyed if abusers are allowed to continue to use JUNK SCIENCE in order to remove protective parents from a child’s life and place children with an alleged abuser. Do we want to place these children with potential alleged abusers? Don’t know about you but I do not. And now a young child is being denied a relationship with a sibling by a father and Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, and who knows who else in the FATHER’S RIGHT MOVEMENT think this father is completely justified. Ken by his own words, and Sacks by his lack of words. Or is it just that as long as it is a father who is being allegedly denied this is a travesty that must (MUST!!!) be rectified, but when it is a mother or maternal relatives – ahhh who cares? One need only look at the case of Jean Paul Lacombe Diaz in Texas to see this is true. Where are the Ken Walker’s, the Glenn Sacks for this mom who has proof of abuse, has court orders granting her custody of this child? The courts were TRICKED into turning the boy over to father. He did this ILLEGALLY yet we see nobody in the Father’s Rights Movement speaking to the tragedy of this court’s actions.
Oh gee I keep forgetting. That is because the parent who is being denied the child is MOM. Who cares about moms right? After all, the only thing moms are good for is carrying the child, giving birth to the child, feeding the child life supporting breast milk. When the child can walk and talk, the mother should be gone. Fathers are the only important ones now.
ANY QUESTIONS?
Posted by Glenn’s Cult?at 6:56 AM
Labels: Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, PA, PAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS
Technorati Tags: brain,Scam,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,From,Glenn,Cult,Remember,scare,tactic,brains,violence,marriage,Mother,Father,custody,spouse,American,television,news,relationship,children,rights,Walker,fact,quotes,Brazil,placement,Give,Just,rules,Women,Ladies,Here,COULD,hook,JUNK,SCIENCE,life,abuser,MOVEMENT,words,Jean,Paul,Lacombe,Diaz,Texas,Where,orders,courts,tragedy,actions,parent,accusations,allegations,Fathers,Disorders,ones,grandparents,abusers,moms
Remember those scare tactic videos about your brain on drugs? Don’t know about you but they worked for me. Now lets take this on a new spin. What is someone who believes PA/PAS/PAD doing to their brains? Why are women the only ones ever accused of alienation or gatekeeping? We have a case here which to my eye appears to have the ever present gatekeeping and alienation tactics happening.
So quick run down on this story. Mom "allegedly" kidnaps child and returns to her native country amid accusations by her of violence in the marriage. Mother remarries after divorce has another child and dies in childbirth. Father to older child goes on rampage in order to secure custody of older child – even amid allegations of violence by mother’s family in foreign country and mother’s widowed current spouse. Father eventually uses American politicians and television news stations in order to carry child out of mother’s native country. Now grandparents want to see child, want child to have a relationship with half sibling and father refuses.
What do you mean – father refuses? I thought all family should be allowed a relationship with children? Even with mother deceased shouldn’t siblings and extended family of mother’s be allowed continuing contact with child?
Apparently not and apparently the well known father’s rights blogger, Glenn Sacks, REFUSES to run any stories on this "gatekeeping" of the child by FATHER. Even Ken Walker (kc9bdr@yahoo.com) agrees that Father should be allowed to keep child from maternal family – in fact he even quotes: "The maternal grandparents take the grandson to Brazil for 5 years, (mother dies) then complain when they don’t get placement. Give it time!". Mother does this and it is automatically a given that mother is gatekeeping and engaging in PA/PAS/PAD. So why is this not true for FATHER? Is FATHER not gatekeeping and possibly engaging in PA/PAS/PAD? The child in question has been around the maternal relatives for years now. Are we punishing another innocent young child by denying that child the RIGHT to have a relationship with the older sibling?
Well, let me explain this so you get it really good, okay? Just as in this commercial about heroin use, PA/PAS/PAD has some rules too.
Women are the only ones who can gatekeep a child. Ladies, ladies. Here’s how it works. It’s only PAS/PA when we accuse you of doing it. When WE do the exact thing we just accused you of doing ("gatekeeping," obstructing visitation, etc.) it doesn’t count. WE are the ONLY ones who can protect our children. These children are not your children, they are only our children. Just like that nice new car we fought for in the divorce, just like the house. Oh and forget about any equitable split, that is all ours too. Any questions?
So go back and watch the video again.
Frying pan is PAS/PA/PAD.
Egg is your brain.
And the violence you see portrayed is what COULD happen if PA/PAS/PAD is bought hook, line, and sinker. Our children, our future will be destroyed if abusers are allowed to continue to use JUNK SCIENCE in order to remove protective parents from a child’s life and place children with an alleged abuser. Do we want to place these children with potential alleged abusers? Don’t know about you but I do not. And now a young child is being denied a relationship with a sibling by a father and Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, and who knows who else in the FATHER’S RIGHT MOVEMENT think this father is completely justified. Ken by his own words, and Sacks by his lack of words. Or is it just that as long as it is a father who is being allegedly denied this is a travesty that must (MUST!!!) be rectified, but when it is a mother or maternal relatives – ahhh who cares? One need only look at the case of Jean Paul Lacombe Diaz in Texas to see this is true. Where are the Ken Walker’s, the Glenn Sacks for this mom who has proof of abuse, has court orders granting her custody of this child? The courts were TRICKED into turning the boy over to father. He did this ILLEGALLY yet we see nobody in the Father’s Rights Movement speaking to the tragedy of this court’s actions.
Oh gee I keep forgetting. That is because the parent who is being denied the child is MOM. Who cares about moms right? After all, the only thing moms are good for is carrying the child, giving birth to the child, feeding the child life supporting breast milk. When the child can walk and talk, the mother should be gone. Fathers are the only important ones now.
ANY QUESTIONS?
Posted by Glenn’s Cult?at 6:56 AM
Labels: Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, PA, PAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS
Technorati Tags: brain,Scam,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,From,Glenn,Cult,Remember,scare,tactic,brains,violence,marriage,Mother,Father,custody,spouse,American,television,news,relationship,children,rights,Walker,fact,quotes,Brazil,placement,Give,Just,rules,Women,Ladies,Here,COULD,hook,JUNK,SCIENCE,life,abuser,MOVEMENT,words,Jean,Paul,Lacombe,Diaz,Texas,Where,orders,courts,tragedy,actions,parent,accusations,allegations,Fathers,Disorders,ones,grandparents,abusers,moms
Remember those scare tactic videos about your brain on drugs? Don’t know about you but they worked for me. Now lets take this on a new spin. What is someone who believes PA/PAS/PAD doing to their brains? Why are women the only ones ever accused of alienation or gatekeeping? We have a case here which to my eye appears to have the ever present gatekeeping and alienation tactics happening.
So quick run down on this story. Mom "allegedly" kidnaps child and returns to her native country amid accusations by her of violence in the marriage. Mother remarries after divorce has another child and dies in childbirth. Father to older child goes on rampage in order to secure custody of older child – even amid allegations of violence by mother’s family in foreign country and mother’s widowed current spouse. Father eventually uses American politicians and television news stations in order to carry child out of mother’s native country. Now grandparents want to see child, want child to have a relationship with half sibling and father refuses.
What do you mean – father refuses? I thought all family should be allowed a relationship with children? Even with mother deceased shouldn’t siblings and extended family of mother’s be allowed continuing contact with child?
Apparently not and apparently the well known father’s rights blogger, Glenn Sacks, REFUSES to run any stories on this "gatekeeping" of the child by FATHER. Even Ken Walker (kc9bdr@yahoo.com) agrees that Father should be allowed to keep child from maternal family – in fact he even quotes: "The maternal grandparents take the grandson to Brazil for 5 years, (mother dies) then complain when they don’t get placement. Give it time!". Mother does this and it is automatically a given that mother is gatekeeping and engaging in PA/PAS/PAD. So why is this not true for FATHER? Is FATHER not gatekeeping and possibly engaging in PA/PAS/PAD? The child in question has been around the maternal relatives for years now. Are we punishing another innocent young child by denying that child the RIGHT to have a relationship with the older sibling?
Well, let me explain this so you get it really good, okay? Just as in this commercial about heroin use, PA/PAS/PAD has some rules too.
Women are the only ones who can gatekeep a child. Ladies, ladies. Here’s how it works. It’s only PAS/PA when we accuse you of doing it. When WE do the exact thing we just accused you of doing ("gatekeeping," obstructing visitation, etc.) it doesn’t count. WE are the ONLY ones who can protect our children. These children are not your children, they are only our children. Just like that nice new car we fought for in the divorce, just like the house. Oh and forget about any equitable split, that is all ours too. Any questions?
So go back and watch the video again.
Frying pan is PAS/PA/PAD.
Egg is your brain.
And the violence you see portrayed is what COULD happen if PA/PAS/PAD is bought hook, line, and sinker. Our children, our future will be destroyed if abusers are allowed to continue to use JUNK SCIENCE in order to remove protective parents from a child’s life and place children with an alleged abuser. Do we want to place these children with potential alleged abusers? Don’t know about you but I do not. And now a young child is being denied a relationship with a sibling by a father and Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, and who knows who else in the FATHER’S RIGHT MOVEMENT think this father is completely justified. Ken by his own words, and Sacks by his lack of words. Or is it just that as long as it is a father who is being allegedly denied this is a travesty that must (MUST!!!) be rectified, but when it is a mother or maternal relatives – ahhh who cares? One need only look at the case of Jean Paul Lacombe Diaz in Texas to see this is true. Where are the Ken Walker’s, the Glenn Sacks for this mom who has proof of abuse, has court orders granting her custody of this child? The courts were TRICKED into turning the boy over to father. He did this ILLEGALLY yet we see nobody in the Fa
ther’s Rights Movement speaking to the tragedy of this court’s actions.
Oh gee I keep forgetting. That is because the parent who is being denied the child is MOM. Who cares about moms right? After all, the only thing moms are good for is carrying the child, giving birth to the child, feeding the child life supporting breast milk. When the child can walk and talk, the mother should be gone. Fathers are the only important ones now.
ANY QUESTIONS?
Posted by Glenn’s Cult?at 6:56 AM
Labels: Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, PA, PAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS
Technorati Tags: brain,Scam,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,From,Glenn,Cult,Remember,scare,tactic,brains,violence,marriage,Mother,Father,custody,spouse,American,television,news,relationship,children,rights,Walker,fact,quotes,Brazil,placement,Give,Just,rules,Women,Ladies,Here,COULD,hook,JUNK,SCIENCE,life,abuser,MOVEMENT,words,Jean,Paul,Lacombe,Diaz,Texas,Where,orders,courts,tragedy,actions,parent,accusations,allegations,Fathers,Disorders,ones,grandparents,abusers,moms
Remember those scare tactic videos about your brain on drugs? Don’t know about you but they worked for me. Now lets take this on a new spin. What is someone who believes PA/PAS/PAD doing to their brains? Why are women the only ones ever accused of alienation or gatekeeping? We have a case here which to my eye appears to have the ever present gatekeeping and alienation tactics happening.
So quick run down on this story. Mom "allegedly" kidnaps child and returns to her native country amid accusations by her of violence in the marriage. Mother remarries after divorce has another child and dies in childbirth. Father to older child goes on rampage in order to secure custody of older child – even amid allegations of violence by mother’s family in foreign country and mother’s widowed current spouse. Father eventually uses American politicians and television news stations in order to carry child out of mother’s native country. Now grandparents want to see child, want child to have a relationship with half sibling and father refuses.
What do you mean – father refuses? I thought all family should be allowed a relationship with children? Even with mother deceased shouldn’t siblings and extended family of mother’s be allowed continuing contact with child?
Apparently not and apparently the well known father’s rights blogger, Glenn Sacks, REFUSES to run any stories on this "gatekeeping" of the child by FATHER. Even Ken Walker (kc9bdr@yahoo.com) agrees that Father should be allowed to keep child from maternal family – in fact he even quotes: "The maternal grandparents take the grandson to Brazil for 5 years, (mother dies) then complain when they don’t get placement. Give it time!". Mother does this and it is automatically a given that mother is gatekeeping and engaging in PA/PAS/PAD. So why is this not true for FATHER? Is FATHER not gatekeeping and possibly engaging in PA/PAS/PAD? The child in question has been around the maternal relatives for years now. Are we punishing another innocent young child by denying that child the RIGHT to have a relationship with the older sibling?
Well, let me explain this so you get it really good, okay? Just as in this commercial about heroin use, PA/PAS/PAD has some rules too.
Women are the only ones who can gatekeep a child. Ladies, ladies. Here’s how it works. It’s only PAS/PA when we accuse you of doing it. When WE do the exact thing we just accused you of doing (
"gatekeeping," obstructing visitation, etc.) it doesn’t count. WE are the ONLY ones who can protect our children. These children are not your children, they are only our children. Just like that nice new car we fought for in the divorce, just like the house. Oh and forget about any equitable split, that is all ours too. Any questions?
So go back and watch the video again.
Frying pan is PAS/PA/PAD.
Egg is your brain.
And the violence you see portrayed is what COULD happen if PA/PAS/PAD is bought hook, line, and sinker. Our children, our future will be destroyed if abusers are allowed to continue to use JUNK SCIENCE in order to remove protective parents from a child’s life and place children with an alleged abuser. Do we want to place these children with potential alleged abusers? Don’t know about you but I do not. And now a young child is being denied a relationship with a sibling by a father and Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, and who knows who else in the FATHER’S RIGHT MOVEMENT think this father is completely justified. Ken by his own words, and Sacks by his lack of words. Or is it just that as long as it is a father who is being allegedly denied this is a travesty that must (MUST!!!) be rectified, but when it is a mother or maternal relatives – ahhh who cares? One need only look at the case of Jean Paul Lacombe Diaz in Texas to see this is true. Where are the Ken Walker’s, the Glenn Sacks for this mom who has proof of abuse, has court orders granting her custody of this child? The courts were TRICKED into turning the boy over to father. He did this ILLEGALLY yet we see nobody in the Father’s Rights Movement speaking to the tragedy of this court’s actions.
Oh gee I keep forgetting. That is because the parent who is being denied the child is MOM. Who cares about moms right? After all, the only thing moms are good for is carrying the child, giving birth to the child, feeding the child life supporting breast milk. When the child can walk and talk, the mother should be gone. Fathers are the only important ones now.
ANY QUESTIONS?
Posted by Glenn’s Cult?at 6:56 AM
Labels: Glenn Sacks, Ken Walker, PA, PAD, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome, PAS
Technorati Tags: brain,Scam,Parental,Alienation,Syndrome,From,Glenn,Cult,Remember,scare,tactic,brains,violence,marriage,Mother,Father,custody,spouse,American,television,news,relationship,children,rights,Walker,fact,quotes,Brazil,placement,Give,Just,rules,Women,Ladies,Here,COULD,hook,JUNK,SCIENCE,life,abuser,MOVEMENT,words,Jean,Paul,Lacombe,Diaz,Texas,Where,orders,courts,tragedy,actions,parent,accusations,allegations,Fathers,Disorders,ones,grandparents,abusers,moms
Gender Biased and Punitive: Why Abusers Get Away With Claiming “Parental Alienation”
In DSM-V, Dr. Richard Gardner, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Disorder, Parental Alienation Disorders, Parental Alienation Syndrome on April 6, 2010 at 2:19 am
The late Richard Gardner developed the theory of parental alienation syndrome (PAS) after claiming that one parent alienated the children from the other parent in 90% of his divorcing patients. Though claiming that the “disorder” was not sex specific, he used it almost exclusively against mothers, maintaining that mothers falsely raise domestic violence and incest during custody disputes for tactical gain. Even Gardner admitted PAS was not an actual syndrome; some call it parental alienation (PA), but the concept is identical.
Acceptance
Gardner claimed to have testified in 400 custody cases in 25 states. Although no state has codified PAS, at least 31 states have adopted Gardner’s friendly parent concept (FPC) in which courts are encouraged to give custody to the parent who will foster a better relationship between the children and the other parent. Even where not codified, many judges and custody evaluators base decisions or recommendations on PAS, PA, or the FPC.
Problems
There are problems associated with PAS, PA, and the FPC. They may deflect investigation from the validity of abuse accusations to the protective parent’s behavior. In addition, PAS, PA, and the FPC may deflect courts from noticing that men’s alienation allegations may themselves be alienating behaviors raised for tactical gain.
False Premises
Gardner incorrectly assumed that women need a tactical ploy to not lose custody under the best interest of the child standard. Gardner evidently was unaware that once a child passed its tender years, roughly at age 7, fathers were presumptively entitled to reclaim custody, and that most mothers still win custody under the best interest of the child standard.
Gardner also wrongfully assumed that women often make false incest accusations in custody cases and that they gain advantage from doing so. Incest is raised in only about 6% of custody cases, and only a very small fraction (2%-3%) of this 6% are false. Investigated incest allegations are substantiated as often during custody disputes as at other times, but many child protection agencies do not investigate when a case is in court. Men have been found to make 16 times as many false incest allegations as women (21% vs. 1.3%).
Gardner’s Motivations
Gardner, who had no hospital admitting privileges for his last 25 years and fraudulently claimed to be a clinical professor of child psychiatry, derived his theories to discredit mothers who complained that their partners were abusing them or their children. Gardner, who often testified on behalf of pedophiles, admitted that probably over 95% of all sex abuse allegations are legitimate, but claimed incest and many other deviant sexual practices are normal and not harmful.
Gender Biased and Punitive
PAS, PA, and the FPC may discourage battered women and mothers in incest cases from complaining. Gardner advocated removing custody and if the behaviors continue, denying visitation to the alienating parent. These concepts may not be in the best interest of children as they generally deprive them of their protective parents and place them in the custody of abusive parents. They also may prevent protective parents and children from realizing the wrongfulness of the abuse or from venting their anger, thus exacerbating their pain and inhibiting healing.
These concepts can be considered gender biased since their definitions exclude alienating behaviors most commonly committed by fathers: domestic violence, nonpayment of child support, and raising alienation allegations. They can be used only against custodial parents and impose no penalty on alienating noncustodial parents. An attempt to rename PAS as malicious mother syndrome confirms the bias.
Inadmissible Evidence
Gardner promoted PAS in self-published books. PAS has never been subjected to peer review or been recognized by any professional associations, including the American Psychiatric Association. The Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family characterizes PAS and PA as having no validity. With no validity within the scientific community, neither PAS nor PA is considered admissible in evidence.
—Joan Zorza
Further Readings
Bruch C. Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly vol. 35 (2001). no. (3), pp. 527–552.
Dallam S. J. Dr. Richard Gardner: A review of his theories and opinions on atypical sexuality, pedophilia, and treatment issues. Treating Abuse Today vol. 8 (1998). no. (1), pp. 15–22.
Dore M. K. The “friendly parent” concept: A flawed factor for child custody. Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law vol. 6 (2004). no. (1), pp. 41–56.
Smith R. and Coukos P. Fairness and accuracy in evaluations of domestic violence and child abuse in custody determinations. The Judges’ Journal vol. 36 (1997). no. (4), pp. 38–42, 54–56.
Technorati Tags: Gender,Punitive,Abusers,Away,Parental,Alienation,Scam,Richard,Gardner,Disorder,Syndrome,April,theory,parent,children,Though,violence,custody,concept,Acceptance,cases,Although,courts,relationship,judges,Problems,investigation,behavior,addition,False,Premises,ploy,advantage,Incest,fraction,times,protection,hospital,privileges,professor,psychiatry,partners,pain,nonpayment,bias,Inadmissible,Evidence,self,associations,American,Psychiatric,Association,Report,Psychological,Presidential,Task,Force,Joan,Zorza,Further,Dallam,treatment,Abuse,factor,Loyola,Journal,Public,Interest,Smith,Coukos,accuracy,Disorders,decisions,recommendations,accusations,allegations,fathers,agencies,Motivations,theories,concepts,definitions,opinions,evaluations,behaviors,women,parents
Who does Parental Alienation (PAS) Protect?
An abuser- even a CONVICTED Abusers-CRIMES-Parental Alienation is used in Family Court to Give the children to the Abusers.
I was ‘alienating” because HE beat the hell out of me- convicted in criminal court 8 times!! …and the Courts actually set it up in CO-PARENTING for him to CONTINUE for years to Assault.
PAS is a Defense to Batterers. It is ONLY used with abusers and ONLY in CASES of Abuse to SILENCE the victims.
It calls all allegations of abuse as false- Even when proven Abuse- and Convictions-
It is used Against the victim and every Battered Mothers WILL and DO loose their Children because of the Parental Alienation Theories-
I urge all who are middle line on this to please use common sense before more are killed and suffer irreparable harm as a result of the use of PAS.
I am a PAS casualty – even with Criminal Convictions of Violence the response was- "we don’t want the daughter to KNOW what the Father did to the mother"
Parental Alienation- and my daughter went to the abuser I have barely seen her in over a decade.
This is what Parental Alienation does.. the truth- is to protect from allegations of ALL Abuse- and Defends the Abusers. period.
Claudine Dombrowski Photos of Abuse | Stop Family Violence
http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org
There is a crisis in our nation’s family courts. Judges are awarding child custody to abusers and pedophiles and punishing the safe parent who tries to protect the children from harm. In this section you …
http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/pages/308
Claudine Dombrowski Photos of Abuse
As you view these photos keep in mind that the court awarded FULL CUSTODY of their daughter to the "man" who did this to Claudine.
To read Claudine’s history that was submitted to the IACHR, click here
If you want to know some of the many reasons women stay in abusive relationships, click here
AFTER THE BIRTH OF HER DAUGHTER, 1994
AFTER EX-HUSBAND BEAT HER WITH A CROW BAR, 1996
AFTER EX-HUSBAND RAPED AND BATTERED HER, 2000
AFTER EX-HUSBAND HIRED SOMEONE TO ASSAULT HER, 2003
THE "COFFEE TABLE" IN THE FATHER’S HOME IS A CHILD’S COFFIN. MOUNTED ON THE WALL ABOVE THE SOFA IS A GUN.
- Permalink:
- http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/pages/308
Technorati Tags: Parental,Alienation,Protect,abuser,Abuse,Court,Give,children,Abusers,hell,Courts,CONTINUE,Assault,Defense,Batterers,Against,victim,Mother,result,Criminal,response,daughter,Father,truth,period,Claudine,Dombrowski,Stop,Violence,crisis,nation,Judges,custody,parent,FULL,history,IACHR,relationships,BIRTH,HUSBAND,BEAT,COFFEE,TABLE,HOME,CHILD,COFFIN,WALL,ABOVE,SOFA,Permalink,CRIMES,allegations,Convictions,Theories,Photos,stopfamilyviolence
PBS Documentary: Breaking the Silence; Children's Stories
[vodpodid=Video.2216124&w=425&h=350&fv=docId%3D-7876692673728025307%26playerMode%3Dsimple%26hl%3Den]
Courts Awarding Custody to Abusers and Domestic Violence Homicides Is There a Connection?
Technorati Tags: Documentary,Silence,Children,Parental,Alienation,Video
Domestic Violence (DV) by Proxy: Why Terrorist Tactics Employed by Batterers Are Not "PAS"
http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/pas/DVP.html
September 16, 2009
As more and more abused women lose custody to batterers in family courts, they are wrongly embracing the very ideas that enabled their abusers to gain custody in the first place. False accusations of “parental alienation" are often used by batterers to gain custody and to defend against accusations of abuse.
Some unfortunate women after years of enduring domestic violence have lost custody to the batterers who abused them. In these cases, batterers have made good on their threat to attack their ex-partner in the place she is the most vulnerable—by taking her children away from her. After separation, these batterers continue to wage their campaign of manipulation and abuse by attempting to convince involved children that their mothers never loved them. Looking for a way to describe their batterers’ behavior, some mothers have called what their batterer is doing "parental alienation syndrome."
In reality, what these women are describing from their ex-partners is better termed Domestic Violence by Proxy (DV by Proxy), a term first used by Alina Patterson, author of Health and Healing. DV by Proxy refers to a pattern of behavior which is a parent with a history of using domestic violence or intimidation, uses a child as a substitute when he no longer has access to his former partner. Calling this behavior “parental alienation” is not strong enough to convey the criminal pattern of terroristic behaviors employed by batterers.
When his victim leaves him, batterers often recognize that the most expedient way to continue to hurt his partner is to assert his legal rights to control her access to their children. By gaining control of the children, an abusive male now has a powerful tool which allows him to continue to stalk, harass and batter an ex-partner even when he has no direct access to her. Moreover, by emotionally torturing the child and severing the bond between children and their mother, he is able to hurt his intended victim — the mother — in a way she cannot resist.
DV by Proxy includes tactics such as: threats of harm to children if they display a positive bond to the mother, destroying favored possessions given by the mother, and emotional torture (for example, telling the child the mother hates them, wanted an abortion, and is not coming to get them because they are unloved).
DV by Proxy may also include coaching the child to make false allegations regarding their mother’s behavior and harming or punishing the child for not complying. DV by Proxy perpetrators may also create fraudulent documents to defraud the court in order to prevent the mother from gaining custody. Whether or not the child is biologically related to them is irrelevant to perpetrators of DV by Proxy. The perpetrator’s main motivation is to hurt his ex; whether or not his own child is harmed in the process is irrelevant to him.
This is very different from "parental alienation syndrome" as described by the late Richard A. Gardner. Dr. Gardner described PAS as an internal process by which a child aligns themselves with a preferred parent to protect themselves from the divorce conflict. “PAS” is conceptualized as a psychological process of identification with a parent who, according to the theory, encourages this identification at the expense of the other parent.
PAS inducing parents, according to Gardner, are often unconscious of what they are doing to encourage the identification. In contrast, perpetrators of DV by Proxy are very conscious of what they are doing. Controlling, coercive, illegal acts often done by abusive and controlling people, usually men, are not subtle, and do not encourage an identification with a parent. Criminal, fraudulent, coercive acts are visible and obvious. These behaviors encourage compliance by threats and fear. Behaviors involved in DV by Proxy are deliberate and often illegal. These behaviors include: battery, destruction of property, locking children in rooms to prevent them from calling parents, falsifying documents, along with other similar overt behaviors.
The most dangerous aspect of Gardner’s PAS theory is that that the alienating parent’s behavior is theorized to be so subtle as to be unobservable. In other words, the behaviors that are supposed to cause the alienation are assumed to be happening without any proof that they have actually occured. As many women have discovered this makes a charge of "alienation" almost impossible to defend against.
While Gardner’s theories regarding PAS have been shown to be overly general and have not been supported by careful research, behaviors seen in DV by Proxy can be readily observed. Behaviors involved in DV by Proxy are deliberate and planned; many are illegal, and if the child is given the freedom to talk, will be described in great detail by the child.
If the child’s formerly favorable view of the victimized parent changes when exposed to tactics like this over time then it is more likely a form of "Stockholm Syndrome" or traumatic attachment to the abuser, rather than the alignment with one parent and negative reaction to the other that Gardner described as "alienation".
A recent and comprehensive article on PAS and its use in the court system, by Jennifer Hoult can be downloaded here.
For further information:
- Are Protective Parents Losing Custody to Alleged Abusers?Evidence shows that women who raise concerns about family violence during custody litigation run the risk of losing their children.
- Stopfamilyviolence.org: The people’s voice for family peace. Stop Family Violence is a national grassroots organization with a mission to organize and amplify our nation’s collective voice against family violence.
- CA3 -Children Against Court Appointed Child Abuse
- High-conflict divorce or stalking by way of family court?Massachusetts Family Law Journal, 2004.http://www.mincava.umn.edu/reports/linda.asp
- Hoult, Jennifer. (Spring 2006). The Evidentiary Admissibility of Parental Alienation Syndrome: Science, Law, and Policy,Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 26(1) pp. 1-61. (download PDF)
Technorati Tags: Domestic,Violence,Proxy,Terrorist,Tactics,Batterers,September,custody,courts,ideas,False,alienation,Some,cases,threat,children
,separation,manipulation,behavior,syndrome,partners,Alina,Patterson,author,Health,parent,history,intimidation,victim,rights,male,tool,Moreover,threats,possessions,example,documents,Whether,perpetrator,motivation,Richard,Gardner,theory,expense,Criminal,compliance,Behaviors,battery,destruction,rooms,aspect,words,freedom,Stockholm,attachment,abuser,alignment,reaction,article,system,Jennifer,Hoult,Protective,Parents,Abusers,Evidence,litigation,Stopfamilyviolence,peace,Stop,grassroots,organization,mission,nation,Against,Court,Child,Abuse,High,Massachusetts,Journal,reports,Evidentiary,Parental,Science,Policy,Legal,accusations,allegations,theories,women,perpetrators,coercive
Dr. Phil & Action Alert! Kathleen Russel with Katie Tagle The Crisis in Family Courts
Lets hope dr fool dont f^&* this one up-
BREAKING NEWS
CJE’s own Kathleen Russell has been invited to appear on the Dr. Phil Show!
She will be speaking about the growing crisis in our family courts, and will appear alongside Katie Tagle and others. Tagle’s 9-month-old child was killed by his father after three judges denied the boy protection, even after the dad threatened in writing to kill their son.
This is a great opportunity to make sure Dr. Phil takes the crisis in our family courts seriously!
We encourage anyone who can make it to LA this Wednesday to COME TO THE DR. PHIL SHOW TAPING & SHOW YOUR SUPPORT!
To RSVP and claim your FREE admission, call either: Elaine at 323-956-3334 or Jason at 323-956-8497 this Monday between 10AM – 4PM. Be sure to tell them that you heard about the taping from CJE!
DATE OF TAPING: Wednesday, March 24
LOCATION: Provided Upon RSVP (Hollywood)
TIME: Arrive at the studio no later than 8:00AM — taping will begin at 9:30AM and you will be free to leave by around 11:00AM.
Check the
CJE website for more information – we’ll keep you updated as we firm up the details.
RECENT PRESS
Nearly 100 people gather to protest Judge Lemkau
– Victorville Daily Press 3/8/10
Rebellion in the California Court System
– ABC7 News 2/25/10
For more information, contact CJE at 415-256-9606, or at info@centerforjudicialexcellence.org
IMPACT OPPORTUNITY
Please plan to join us in Sacramento to support Whistleblower Protection in the California Courts.
Hearing Date TBD – likely early April
Assembly Judiciary Committee Hearing – AB 1749 (Whistleblower Protection)
Since 2001, court employees in the state of California have been exempt from Whistleblower Protection — meaning they could lose their jobs if they report wrongdoing. AB 1749 — authored by Assemblymembers Bonnie Lowenthal and Audra Strickland — proposes to expand Whistleblower Protection to judicial employees.
Remember to check CJE’s website often for updates about this hearing and other great opportunities to get involved!
www.centerforjudicialexcellence.org.
SAVE THE DATE
California Protective Parents Association
and Incest Survivors Speakers’ Bureau invite you to the
16th Annual Northern California Child Sexual Abuse Awareness Conference
WHISTLEBLOWER CHILDREN:
What Happens When Children Report Sex Abuse
April 9-10, 2010
Friday, April 9th (Film Festival
Technorati Tags: Phil,Action,Alert,Russel,Katie,Tagle,Crisis,Courts,NEWS,Russell,father,judges,protection,COME,SUPPORT,RSVP,FREE,admission,Elaine,Jason,DATE,March,LOCATION,Upon,Hollywood,TIME,Arrive,studio,Check,RECENT,Judge,Lemkau,Victorville,Rebellion,California,Court,System,info,IMPACT,Sacramento,Whistleblower,April,Judiciary,Committee,employees,Assemblymembers,Bonnie,Lowenthal,Audra,Strickland,Remember,SAVE,Protective,Parents,Association,Incest,Survivors,Bureau,Annual,Northern,Child,Sexual,Abuse,Conference,CHILDREN,Report,Film,Festival,Speakers,website,centerforjudicialexcellence
leave a comment